Export limit exceeded: 18034 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (34 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2016-2195 | 2 Botan Project, Debian | 2 Botan, Debian Linux | 2025-04-12 | N/A |
| Integer overflow in the PointGFp constructor in Botan before 1.10.11 and 1.11.x before 1.11.27 allows remote attackers to overwrite memory and possibly execute arbitrary code via a crafted ECC point, which triggers a heap-based buffer overflow. | ||||
| CVE-2016-2196 | 1 Botan Project | 1 Botan | 2025-04-12 | N/A |
| Heap-based buffer overflow in the P-521 reduction function in Botan 1.11.x before 1.11.27 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (memory overwrite and crash) or execute arbitrary code via unspecified vectors. | ||||
| CVE-2016-2849 | 3 Botan Project, Debian, Fedoraproject | 3 Botan, Debian Linux, Fedora | 2025-04-12 | N/A |
| Botan before 1.10.13 and 1.11.x before 1.11.29 do not use a constant-time algorithm to perform a modular inverse on the signature nonce k, which might allow remote attackers to obtain ECDSA secret keys via a timing side-channel attack. | ||||
| CVE-2016-8871 | 1 Botan Project | 1 Botan | 2025-04-12 | N/A |
| In Botan 1.11.29 through 1.11.32, RSA decryption with certain padding options had a detectable timing channel which could given sufficient queries be used to recover plaintext, aka an "OAEP side channel" attack. | ||||
| CVE-2014-9742 | 1 Botan Project | 1 Botan | 2025-04-12 | N/A |
| The Miller-Rabin primality check in Botan before 1.10.8 and 1.11.x before 1.11.9 improperly uses a single random base, which makes it easier for remote attackers to defeat cryptographic protection mechanisms via a DH group. | ||||
| CVE-2016-2850 | 2 Botan Project, Fedoraproject | 2 Botan, Fedora | 2025-04-12 | N/A |
| Botan 1.11.x before 1.11.29 does not enforce TLS policy for (1) signature algorithms and (2) ECC curves, which allows remote attackers to conduct downgrade attacks via unspecified vectors. | ||||
| CVE-2024-39312 | 2 Botan Project, Randombit | 2 Botan, Botan | 2025-04-11 | 5.3 Medium |
| Botan is a C++ cryptography library. X.509 certificates can identify elliptic curves using either an object identifier or using explicit encoding of the parameters. A bug in the parsing of name constraint extensions in X.509 certificates meant that if the extension included both permitted subtrees and excluded subtrees, only the permitted subtree would be checked. If a certificate included a name which was permitted by the permitted subtree but also excluded by excluded subtree, it would be accepted. Fixed in versions 3.5.0 and 2.19.5. | ||||
| CVE-2021-40529 | 3 Botan Project, Fedoraproject, Mozilla | 3 Botan, Fedora, Thunderbird | 2024-11-21 | 5.9 Medium |
| The ElGamal implementation in Botan through 2.18.1, as used in Thunderbird and other products, allows plaintext recovery because, during interaction between two cryptographic libraries, a certain dangerous combination of the prime defined by the receiver's public key, the generator defined by the receiver's public key, and the sender's ephemeral exponents can lead to a cross-configuration attack against OpenPGP. | ||||
| CVE-2021-24115 | 1 Botan Project | 1 Botan | 2024-11-21 | 9.8 Critical |
| In Botan before 2.17.3, constant-time computations are not used for certain decoding and encoding operations (base32, base58, base64, and hex). | ||||
| CVE-2018-9860 | 1 Botan Project | 1 Botan | 2024-11-21 | N/A |
| An issue was discovered in Botan 1.11.32 through 2.x before 2.6.0. An off-by-one error when processing malformed TLS-CBC ciphertext could cause the receiving side to include in the HMAC computation exactly 64K bytes of data following the record buffer, aka an over-read. The MAC comparison will subsequently fail and the connection will be closed. This could be used for denial of service. No information leak occurs. | ||||
| CVE-2018-9127 | 1 Botan Project | 1 Botan | 2024-11-21 | N/A |
| Botan 2.2.0 - 2.4.0 (fixed in 2.5.0) improperly handled wildcard certificates and could accept certain certificates as valid for hostnames when, under RFC 6125 rules, they should not match. This only affects certificates issued to the same domain as the host, so to impersonate a host one must already have a wildcard certificate matching other hosts in the same domain. For example, b*.example.com would match some hostnames that do not begin with a 'b' character. | ||||
| CVE-2018-20187 | 1 Botan Project | 1 Botan | 2024-11-21 | N/A |
| A side-channel issue was discovered in Botan before 2.9.0. An attacker capable of precisely measuring the time taken for ECC key generation may be able to derive information about the high bits of the secret key, as the function to derive the public point from the secret scalar uses an unblinded Montgomery ladder whose loop iteration count depends on the bitlength of the secret. This issue affects only key generation, not ECDSA signatures or ECDH key agreement. | ||||
| CVE-2018-12435 | 1 Botan Project | 1 Botan | 2024-11-21 | N/A |
| Botan 2.5.0 through 2.6.0 before 2.7.0 allows a memory-cache side-channel attack on ECDSA signatures, aka the Return Of the Hidden Number Problem or ROHNP, related to dsa/dsa.cpp, ec_group/ec_group.cpp, and ecdsa/ecdsa.cpp. To discover an ECDSA key, the attacker needs access to either the local machine or a different virtual machine on the same physical host. | ||||
| CVE-2017-7252 | 1 Botan Project | 1 Botan | 2024-11-21 | 7.5 High |
| bcrypt password hashing in Botan before 2.1.0 does not correctly handle passwords with a length between 57 and 72 characters, which makes it easier for attackers to determine the cleartext password. | ||||